Elon Musk Wants to Make ‘Star Trek’ Real—But It Loses the Soul
Bottom line: Elon Musk says he can build a real‑life Star Trek, yet he strips away the parts that made the series iconic.
Elon Musk Wants to Make ‘Star Trek’ Real—But It Loses the Soul
Image: Elon Musk Wants to Make ‘Star Trek’ Real—But It Loses the Soul – Performance Comparison and Specifications
Design & Looks
Musk’s vision focuses on sleek metal, minimal windows, and a cockpit that looks more like a Tesla dashboard than a Starfleet bridge. He loves the idea of a stainless‑steel hull, but he ignores the bold colors, the iconic insignia, and the warm lighting that gave the original show its optimistic feel. In short, the design feels more like a space‑age truck than a hopeful future.
Performance & Mileage
When Musk talks performance, he mentions the Raptor R‑2 engine, a sea‑level thrust that could push a ship to orbit in minutes. He also boasts a “mileage” of roughly 1,200 miles on a single refuel—enough for a quick hop between Earth and low‑Earth orbit. The numbers sound impressive, but they miss the point of Star Trek: the journey, not just the speed.
| Engine | Mileage | Price | Top Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raptor R‑2 | ~1,200 miles (orbital) | $2 billion (estimate) | Reusable, stainless steel, rapid turnaround |
Price & Rivals
The projected cost runs into the billions, dwarfing even NASA’s most ambitious projects. Compared with NASA’s Artemis program or private lunar landers, Musk’s “Star Trek” ship is pricier but offers less in terms of scientific payload capacity. Rivals like Blue Origin’s New Glenn focus on reusable rockets without the fantasy veneer, making Musk’s version feel like a high‑priced novelty.
FAQ
- What is the mileage of Musk’s Star Trek ship? About 1,200 miles per refuel, enough for a quick orbital hop.
- Is Musk’s version worth the price? It’s expensive and lacks the cultural charm of the original series, so most experts see it as a tech demo rather than a practical vehicle.
- How does this project compare to NASA’s Artemis? Artemis focuses on lunar exploration with proven technology, while Musk’s concept trades scientific utility for a flashy, but less functional, design.
What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Source: Read Official News
