Bottom Line Up Front
When gasoline ran out during World War II, Europeans turned to wood‑gas cars – simple machines that burned wood chips to keep them moving.
Wood-Powered Cars of WWII – Design, Mileage & Price
Image: Wood-Powered Cars of WWII – Design, Mileage & Price – Performance Comparison and Specifications
Design & Looks
Wood‑gas vehicles looked almost identical to their petrol counterparts. The biggest visual cue was a bulky metal box mounted on the trunk or beside the engine, housing the gasifier and fuel tank. Drivers often added extra grilles to improve airflow. Because the system was heavy, many cars sat lower in the chassis, giving them a squat profile that some owners liked.
Key point: the design was functional, not flashy – it was all about getting a car to run on whatever wood was at hand.
Performance & Mileage
Wood gas has a lower energy density than gasoline, so mileage dropped to around 6‑8 miles per gallon. Acceleration was modest; a typical 1.5 L engine produced about 30 hp after the gasifier was attached. Still, the cars could cruise at 40‑50 km/h on rough wartime roads, which was enough to move troops, supplies, or a family to the next town.
| Engine | Mileage | Price | Top Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wood‑gasifier (external) | 6‑8 mpg | ~1,500 Reichsmarks (wartime) |
|
Price & Rivals
Because the conversion kit cost about a third of a new car, many owners preferred to retrofit an existing vehicle. Compared with diesel or petrol models, wood‑gas cars were cheaper to run but slower and less refined. Their main rivals were the German “Trabant” and the French “Citroën 2CV,” both of which also received wood‑gas kits when fuel was scarce.
FAQ
What mileage could a wood‑gas car achieve?
Typically 6‑8 mpg, depending on the engine size and wood quality.
Were wood‑gas cars safe to drive?
Yes, but the gasifier produced hot exhaust and required regular cleaning to avoid carbon buildup.
Is a wood‑gas conversion worth doing today?
For modern use it’s impractical; the system is heavy, noisy, and far less efficient than today’s hybrids or EVs.
What do you think about this forgotten chapter of automotive history? Leave a comment below and share your thoughts!
Source: Read Official News
