Chevy Stovebolt Engine: Name Origin, Design, Performance & Value

modest today, but they were respectable for a low‑cost family car in the 1930s. Price & Rivals When it launched, Chevrolet priced the 216 cid Stovebolt at about. Complete details, specifications & price comparison.

Design & Looks

The 1932 Chevrolet “Stovebolt” got its nickname from the bolt heads that look like the ones used on wood‑burning stoves. The engine’s cast‑iron block and simple, sturdy appearance made it look like a workhorse you could trust to run all day.

Key visual cues:

  • Round, exposed bolt heads on the cylinder head.
  • Large, easy‑to‑read casting numbers.
  • Compact dimensions that fit under the modest hoods of early Chevrolets.

Performance & Mileage

Despite its plain looks, the Stovebolt was a technical leap for its time. A 7‑bearing crankshaft and overhead‑valve (OHV) design gave it smoother power delivery than many flat‑head rivals.

In real‑world driving the engine produced about 60 hp and achieved roughly 15 mpg city and 20 mpg highway. Those numbers sound modest today, but they were respectable for a low‑cost family car in the 1930s.

Price & Rivals

When it launched, Chevrolet priced the 216 cid Stovebolt at about $450 – a full $100 less than Ford’s competing V‑8. That price advantage, combined with durability, helped Chevrolet outsell its rivals for years.

Other manufacturers offered similar displacement engines, but few matched the Stovebolt’s blend of simplicity, low maintenance, and parts availability.

EngineMileagePrice (original)Top Features
Chevy 216 (3.5 L) Stovebolt≈15 mpg city / 20 mpg hwy$450 (1932)
  • Cast‑iron block
  • 7‑bearing crankshaft
  • Simple OHV layout
  • Robust bottom end

FAQ

What does “Stovebolt” mean?

The name comes from the round, stove‑type bolts used on the cylinder head, a visual cue that stuck with enthusiasts.

How much fuel did the Stovebolt use?

It averaged about 15 mpg in city traffic and 20 mpg on the highway, which was typical for a small V‑8 of its era.

Is the Stovebolt still worth restoring?

For collectors, the engine’s historical value and parts availability make it a popular project. Its simple design keeps rebuild costs low compared to modern engines.

What do you think about the Chevy Stovebolt? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Source: Read Official News


Scroll to Top